By Gerald Dworkin (editor)
John Stuart Mill's On Liberty (1860) maintains to form glossy Western conceptions of person freedom. during this quantity, 8 best Mill students touch upon this landmark paintings. Their essays, chosen for his or her significance and accessibility, function an exceptional creation to this foundational textual content. Designed with political philosophy and philosophy of legislation classes in brain, this number of essays by means of the major Mill students is a perfect advent to On Liberty. transparent and insightful, the essays clarify the ongoing relevance of Mill's paintings to modern struggles to guard person rights with out harming others. the gathering is usually helpful for classes dedicated to Mill at both the undergraduate or graduate level.Mill and Milquetoast, David Lewis. John Stuart Mill and the damage of Pornography, David Dyzenhaus. Mill and Pornography, Robert Skipper. Paternalism, Gerald Dworkin. Paternalism, software, and equity, Richard Arneson. Liberty and damage to Others, David Lyons. Profound Offense, Joel Feinberg. The Doctrine of Liberty in its software to Morals, James Fitzjames Stephen.
Read or Download Mill's On liberty: critical essays PDF
Best civil rights & liberties books
The ''first ever'' technology of Freedom-Building. offers ideational types, platforms and steps for Freedom-Building. provides the highbrow constructs for constructing family and overseas Freedom-Building guidelines. a major and demanding learn for severe, vital paintings. particularly, the liberty Doctrine explains and relates degrees of center stipulations for Freedom-Building: cultural referring to, fiscal firm, and governance aid.
Within the past due Sixties id politics emerged at the political panorama and challenged winning rules approximately social justice. those politics introduced forth a brand new consciousness to social id, an realization that maintains to divide buyers. whereas past stories have serious about the political pursuits of this era, they've got missed the conceptual prehistory of this political flip.
This pathbreaking ebook is the 1st substantial contribution to a sociology of human rights and takes up the query of even if so-called Asian values have compatibility with human rights discourse. utilizing a sociological and poststructuralist method of the concept that of rights, and incorporating transnationality into sociological conception, Anthony Woodiwiss demonstrates how the worldwide human rights regime can accommodate Asian patriarchialism, whereas Pacific Asia is itself adapting through what he calls "enforceable benevolence.
Lifelong liberal Kirsten Powers blasts the Left's compelled march in the direction of conformity in an exposé of the intolerant battle on unfastened speech. not champions of tolerance and loose speech, the "illiberal Left" now viciously assaults and silences a person with substitute issues of view. Powers asks, "What ever occurred to loose speech in the US?
Extra resources for Mill's On liberty: critical essays
Page 8 Mill's lists of harms and benefits feature the high-faluting, interesting, speculative ones. He omits the obvious. The insult of paternalism. If I paternalise over you, and in particular if I prevent you from being exposed to some seductive heresy, my action is manifestly premised on doubt of your competence, and on confidence in my own. You are likely to take offence both at my low opinion of you and at my pretension of superiority. No less so, if you acknowledge that I am indeed more competent than you are to govern your life.
Each faction would have protection from its treaty partners, and if it had chosen its partners well, that would give it the protection it needs. Each faction would extend toleration so far as its treaties require, and no farther. Two factions would enter into a treaty only when both thought it advantageous, given the strategic balance between them, their estimate of the fortunes of war, and their estimate of the potential for good or harm of the opinions that would be protected. The weak, who can offer no reciprocal toleration worth seeking, and the fanatically intolerant, who will not offer reciprocal toleration, would of course be left out of the network of treaties.
But not from factual premises that are part of the very dispute between the suppressors and the suppressed. It is Mill's ambition to defend toleration even when questions remain disputed, therefore it will not do to require some settlement of the dispute before the case for toleration can be completed. The neutralism of Mill's practice goes further. Some utilitarian might say to the believers that according to their opinion toleration maximises utility because God is offended more by the cruelty of inquisitors than by the impudence of atheists; and might argue to the atheists that according to their opinion toleration maximises utility because there is no God to be offended.